Continuing Professional Development
Verified Annually, Not Assumed
Anyone can claim expertise. Few submit it for independent, annual verification. This page is that record.
I have completed and submitted my Continuing Professional Development (CPD) activity to The Security Institute in four separate years since 2022, most recently 2026, each one independently assessed against the Institute's standard rather than self-declared.
What CPD verification actually means
The Security Institute is the UK's chartered body for security professionals. Its CPD scheme is not a box-ticking exercise. Members submit a structured record of their learning, professional practice and contribution to the field each year, and the Institute assesses it before issuing confirmation. Certification is annual. It lapses if the work behind it stops.
That distinction matters in a field where credentials are frequently self-declared, badge-collected or never renewed. A CPD certificate carries a date. It says the holder was doing the work in that specific year, not simply that they passed an exam once.
The record, year by year
| Year | Status | Signatory |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Verified — certificate below | Sarah Austerberry, CSyP FSyI, Chief Executive Officer |
| 2025 | Verified — certificate below | Julie Nel, MSyI, Chair |
| 2024 | Verified — certificate below | Julie Nel, MSyI, Chair |
| 2023 | Verified — certificate below | Julie Nel, MSyI, Chair |
| 2022 | Verified — certificate below | Bob Martin, JP CSyP FSyI, Director, Professional Development |
| 2021 | Verified — certificate below | Peter Lavery FSyI |
The 2022 certificate was issued at Member grade (MSyI). The 2023, 2024 and 2026 certificates were issued after advancement to Fellow (FSyI). Each certificate is reproduced exactly as issued, post-nominals included, rather than restated in current form.

Certificate — 2024
Certificate — 2023
Certificate — 2022
Certificate — 2021Why this sits on this site
Duty of care, security governance and risk advice carry consequences when the advice is wrong. Competency and currency are part of how that advice should be tested, not assumed. This page is a standing, checkable record: the credential, the assessing body, the date and the signatory, for each year it exists. It is here so it can be verified, not just cited, and it will be corrected in the open if a year turns out to be wrong or missing.
Tony Ridley, MSc CSyP FSyI SRMCP