Why Everything Feels Like a Disaster: 5 Surprising Truths About the Risk Society

Tony Ridley, MSc, CSyP, FSyI, SRMCP. Originally published 13 August 2026.

We are living through a strange contradiction. Media cycles run hot with warnings about mobile phone radiation, food additives and looming pandemics, while the historical data tells a different story: societies today are safer, on almost every measure, than at any point in human history. Our ancestors faced visible, immediate carnage. We face threats that are often difficult to see, quantify or explain in plain technical terms. Yet the alarm keeps ringing. Why do we resist the data that says we are safer, and reach instead for the feeling that we are not?

This piece examines that contradiction through the sociology of risk rather than its mathematics. It asks what happens when institutions, regulators and boards treat risk as an objective, measurable thing rather than as a category of understanding, a lens through which particular hazards get selected, amplified or ignored. It looks at how iconic disasters get remembered, how authority uses risk management to manage its own insecurity rather than the public's exposure, and how well-intentioned transparency can backfire and entrench the fear it was meant to calm. It closes on a genuinely difficult question for any parent, professional or policymaker: what happens when probability, built for populations, is asked to answer for a single life.

This is a member article. The full piece is available to members. Become a member to read it in full.